CMS is expanding prior authorization in 2026, reshaping surgical and procedural care. See how new rules impact ASCs, HOPDs, and practices- and what strategies help avoid denials and protect revenue.
With Q4 2025 underway, the outlook for procedural and surgical care is shifting as new policies take aim at how services are authorized and reimbursed.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has steadily expanded prior authorization and pre-claim review programs in an effort to safeguard Medicare funds and reduce billing errors. These programs are now extending more deeply into procedural and surgical specialties, which means both clinical and financial operations will feel the effects. Although CMS frames these requirements as protections for patients and taxpayers, they represent a new reality for outpatient procedural practices, ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), and hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs).
To understand what this means, it is helpful to start with how these programs function at the ground level.
Prior authorization (PA) requires providers to submit documentation and receive approval before performing a service, while pre-claim review (PCR) allows the service to be rendered but delays the claim until documentation is reviewed. In both cases, the medical necessity rules remain unchanged. What shifts is the timing of submission.
CMS argues that this earlier review helps reduce denials and appeals, providing providers with greater certainty of payment. With that said, CMS has been steadily expanding these requirements over time. Since 2020, CMS has widened the scope of services that require prior authorization (from cosmetic & reconstructive procedures to now including spinal neurostimulators, cervical fusions, and facet joint interventions).
...and more.
Starting in 2026, CMS will require procedural and surgical specialties to meet just a few key standards: obtain prior authorization for targeted outpatient services in pilot states, follow existing OPD rules for designated procedures, and prepare for new seven-day and 72-hour decision clocks in MA, Medicaid, and CHIP, supported by electronic prior auth systems. These requirements don’t add new clinical documentation, but they do shift when and how it must be submitted, making early, accurate preparation the critical factor for avoiding delays and protecting revenue.
The ripple effects of expanded prior authorization are already visible. Surgeons and schedulers must prepare documentation earlier, creating additional strain on pre-admission testing (PAT) teams. Financial exposure grows as incomplete submissions risk delays or denials. Patients may wait longer for necessary care, particularly for time-sensitive procedures, and regional disparities emerge as pilot states shoulder a heavier administrative burden than others.
The most effective strategies start with a close look at internal workflows:
CMS’s expansion of prior authorization signals a new era of utilization control in outpatient surgical care. What started narrow now shapes how procedures are scheduled, documented, and reimbursed. For providers, the focus must shift from chasing approvals to building systems that keep cases moving and revenue protected.
Subscribe for the latest insights on surgical workflows, anesthesia best practices, and healthcare innovation.
Dive into our latest posts on surgical workflows, anesthesia care, and healthcare trends. Discover tips, trends, and expert perspectives to stay ahead in the OR.